Home News Teenager Invests Big in Monopoly GO

Teenager Invests Big in Monopoly GO

by Layla Jan 27,2025

Teenager Invests Big in Monopoly GO

A $25,000 Monopoly GO Spending Spree Highlights Microtransaction Risks

A recent incident involving a 17-year-old who reportedly spent $25,000 on in-app purchases for Monopoly GO underscores the potential financial pitfalls of microtransactions in free-to-play games. While the game is free to download, its reliance on microtransactions for progression and rewards has led to significant spending by many users.

This isn't an isolated case. Other players have reported spending substantial sums, with one user admitting to spending $1,000 before deleting the app. However, the $25,000 expenditure reported on Reddit by a step-parent seeking advice significantly surpasses previous accounts. The post, since removed, detailed 368 individual purchases made through the App Store.

The situation highlights a common problem: the difficulty of obtaining refunds for unintentional in-app purchases. Many commenters on the Reddit thread suggested that Monopoly GO's terms of service likely hold the user responsible for all transactions, regardless of intent. This practice is prevalent in the freemium gaming model, a strategy exemplified by Pokemon TCG Pocket's $208 million revenue in its first month.

The Ongoing Debate Surrounding In-Game Microtransactions

The Monopoly GO incident adds to the ongoing controversy surrounding in-game microtransactions. Similar issues have led to lawsuits against gaming companies, such as the class-action lawsuit filed against Take-Two Interactive concerning NBA 2K's microtransaction model. While this specific Monopoly GO case may not reach litigation, it underscores the widespread frustration caused by these monetization strategies.

The profitability of microtransactions is undeniable. Games like Diablo 4 have generated over $150 million in revenue through this model. The strategy's effectiveness lies in its ability to encourage smaller, frequent purchases rather than larger, one-time investments. However, this very characteristic contributes to the criticism; the cumulative effect of these small purchases can lead to unexpected and significant spending.

The Reddit user's predicament serves as a cautionary tale, illustrating the ease with which significant sums can be spent in games like Monopoly GO. It also highlights the need for greater transparency and consumer protection regarding in-app purchases.

Latest Articles More+
  • 07 2025-07
    "New Need For Speed Release Delayed"

    EA's Executive Vice President, Vince Zampella, recently provided an update regarding the current state of the *Need for Speed* franchise. It’s been over two years since the release of *NFS Unbound*, and since then, there has been little to no official news about what’s next for the iconic racing ser

  • 01 2025-07
    "Witcher 4 Creators Support Blood of Dawnwalker Authors, No Competition with Rebel Wolves"

    Gamers around the world have started to take notice of *The Blood of Dawnwalker*, with many drawing comparisons to *The Witcher 4*. This growing interest is not surprising, especially considering that the project was developed by former members of CD Projekt Red. The stylistic and atmospheric simila

  • 01 2025-07
    Discover Captain Henqua's Spoils in Avowed: A Guide

    One of the most engaging ways players can immerse themselves in the world of *Avowed* is by uncovering hidden treasures through a variety of treasure maps scattered throughout the game. In the early stages of your journey, specifically in the Dawnshore region, you’ll come across a unique opportunity